Comments on: Prototype String.toQueryParams() weirdness http://www.achingbrain.net/alex/prototype-stringtoqueryparams-weirdness Not just another WordPress weblog Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:32:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: AP http://www.achingbrain.net/alex/prototype-stringtoqueryparams-weirdness#comment-419 AP Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:09:28 +0000 http://www.achingbrain.net/?p=167#comment-419 Nevermind the above comment we found the backend was doing the conversion. Nevermind the above comment we found the backend was doing the conversion.

]]> By: AP http://www.achingbrain.net/alex/prototype-stringtoqueryparams-weirdness#comment-417 AP Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:35:58 +0000 http://www.achingbrain.net/?p=167#comment-417 I applied the patch and it seemed to be working, but if you throw it an ASCII Hex code/value, like %50, it fails. Or not fail, but it converts it to its keyboard character equivalent, %50 = 'P' I applied the patch and it seemed to be working, but if you throw it an ASCII Hex code/value, like %50, it fails. Or not fail, but it converts it to its keyboard character equivalent, %50 = ‘P’

]]> By: alex http://www.achingbrain.net/alex/prototype-stringtoqueryparams-weirdness#comment-390 alex Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:38:47 +0000 http://www.achingbrain.net/?p=167#comment-390 Mainly because of work. When the project began, Prototype best fitted our needs and we're too far along to consider re-implementing. Not until version 2 at any rate. Granted at one point the documentation (or lack thereof) was shockingly bad, but nowadays <a href="http://www.prototypejs.org/api" rel="nofollow">we are spoilt</a>. I'm not sure why you have a problem with the implementation as it's a library like any other - code to the API and forget about it. When it doesn't work as expected, <a href="http://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/dashboard" rel="nofollow">file a bug</a>. As for the code, again I'm not sure what you mean. Could the problem you have be that it doesn't look like Java? Mainly because of work. When the project began, Prototype best fitted our needs and we’re too far along to consider re-implementing. Not until version 2 at any rate.

Granted at one point the documentation (or lack thereof) was shockingly bad, but nowadays we are spoilt.

I’m not sure why you have a problem with the implementation as it’s a library like any other - code to the API and forget about it. When it doesn’t work as expected, file a bug.

As for the code, again I’m not sure what you mean. Could the problem you have be that it doesn’t look like Java?

]]> By: Martin http://www.achingbrain.net/alex/prototype-stringtoqueryparams-weirdness#comment-389 Martin Fri, 18 Apr 2008 06:43:20 +0000 http://www.achingbrain.net/?p=167#comment-389 why do you still bother using Prototype? it's a real PITA from the code, implementation and to the documentation itself! why do you still bother using Prototype? it’s a real PITA from the code, implementation and to the documentation itself!

]]> By: alex http://www.achingbrain.net/alex/prototype-stringtoqueryparams-weirdness#comment-377 alex Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:52:45 +0000 http://www.achingbrain.net/?p=167#comment-377 Daniel - what didn't work? Daniel - what didn’t work?

]]> By: Daniel http://www.achingbrain.net/alex/prototype-stringtoqueryparams-weirdness#comment-376 Daniel Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:11:15 +0000 http://www.achingbrain.net/?p=167#comment-376 no it didnt worked :( no it didnt worked :(

]]> By: Daniel http://www.achingbrain.net/alex/prototype-stringtoqueryparams-weirdness#comment-375 Daniel Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:46:57 +0000 http://www.achingbrain.net/?p=167#comment-375 I have the same problem and i was making my brain ache too!! DAMN! I have the same problem and i was making my brain ache too!! DAMN!

]]>